Legal Opinion
In Re Lansing Urban Renewal
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1976No. 23218PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 Mich. App. 158 (1976)
242 N.W.2d 51
In re LANSING URBAN RENEWAL.
CITY OF LANSING
v.
WERY.
Docket No. 23218.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided March 24, 1976.
Bruce S. King, for plaintiff.
Sinas, Dramis, Brake, Turner, Boughton & McIntyre, P.C., Farhat, Burns & Story, P.C., and Newman & Mackay, P.C., for defendants.
Before: N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J., and DANHOF and T.M. BURNS, JJ.
Leave to appeal denied, 397 Mich 828.
N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J.
Both parties appeal from a condemnation award in the amount of $184,127 rendered after a bench trial by the Ingham County Circuit Court. A jury had been impaneled but was,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Jeffries Homes Housing ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Campau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- State Highway Commission v. L & L Concession Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re Park Site on Private Claim 16Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re Petition of State Highway Com'r.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lenawee County v. WagleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- City of Detroit v. Michael's PrescriptionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Highway Commission v. GaffieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Detroit v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- City of Detroit v. HopkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979