St. Cyr v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal
WARNER, J.
In this appeal of an order denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the state has moved to supplement the appellate record with the sentencing documents from appellant’s case file, as it claims a review of the sentencing documents is required for a complete understanding of appellant’s sentence and to respond to the issue raised in appellant’s brief. We deny the motion.
One would think that an appellate court should have available to it the actual sentencing documents any time…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Bennett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Perez-Boza v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Smedley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casteel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- JESSIE WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Goodson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- Mackendale v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013