Legal Opinion

Cid v. Erie Insurance Group

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 2013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BOWES, J.:

Hilda Cid filed the within appeal from the trial court’s February 22, 2012 order dismissing her petition seeking appointment of a neutral arbitrator in an underin-sured motorist arbitration (“UIM”). Dismissal was based upon improper venue and without prejudice to re-file in Montgomery County. Ms. Cid argues on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the petition on venue grounds because Erie Insurance Group (“Erie”) waived any objection to venue by failing to timely file preliminary objections to the petition. We find that under Philadelphia County…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shearer v. NaftzingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Boyce v. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Schultz v. MMI Products, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Clark v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Sehl v. NeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferrick v. BianchiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Scarlett v. MasonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Cid, H. v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Cid, H. v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Edwards, K. v. Allstate Insurance Comp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API