Legal Opinion

Commercial Insurance v. Treasury Bank

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. John G-. Rogers, Judge, presiding. .

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

The declaration sets out, in liceo verba, a copy of a policy of insurance payable to Boyington, Cash & Wilder, on the back of which is the following indorsement: “Loss, if any, under this policy, is hereby made payable to the Treasury Bank of Chicago, as its interest may appear. Nov. 28, 1866, J. Farmer, Sec’y.”

There is no averment in the declaration that this indorsement was made by the company, or that the assured requested it, or consented to it.

Objection was made to the introduction of the policy, when offered, and a motion in arrest of judgment was also made.

The pleader has merely…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Key ex rel. Heaton v. Continental InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago v. Group Administrators, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  3. East St. Louis Lumber Co. v. United States Branch of the London Assurance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  4. Moline Plow Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API