G. H. Haulenbeck Advertising Agency v. November

The trial was somewhat peculiar and, therefore, it was important to prove the authority of Mr. Berger to bind the other members of his firm in any- matter not directly within the line and scope of the partnership business. It is conceded that the contract which was in writing is made between the plaintiff and The American Cloak & Suit Company, .per Emil Bergér, and Was written on the letterffiead of the -firm 'and was signed at i plaintiff’s office. . .

It was attempted to be shown by the appellants that when Emil Berger signed the within contract he acted entirely without the scope of his…