Legal Opinion

Scritchfield v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1997No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Arlette Perry, doing business as Woodlawn Hotel, and J.A.C.E.P., Ltd., doing business as Woodlawn Hotel (defendants), moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff defaulted in responding, and Supreme Court granted the motion. Before an order was signed or entered, plaintiff moved for additional time to respond to the motion and “to vacate any default on the part of [plaintiff] * * * thereto”. Defendants cross-moved to vacate plaintiff’s note of issue and for further discovery in the event that plaintiff’s motion was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levinger v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Vinciguerra v. JamesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. American Re-Insurance Co. v. SGB Universal Builders Supply, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Corbett v. ZedaykoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hulett v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Rought v. PalidarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Burns v. Haines Equipment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Scritchfield v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API