King v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Where one person has sustained an injury from the negligence of another, he must, in general, proceed against him by whose negligence the injury was occasioned. If, however, the negligence which caused the injury was that of a servant, while engaged in his master's business, the person sustaining the injury may disregard the immediate author of the mischief and hold the master responsible for the damages sustained. The master selects the servant, and the servant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Storrs v. . the City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by47 opinions
- Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Butler v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Stringham v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Robideaux v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.