Legal Opinion

Marshall E. Boykin and Jimmie Boykin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1965No. 21595_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.

By this Petition for Review, Taxpayer 1 questions the correctness of the Tax Court’s decision that he had not “held” a purchased farm in excess of six months and therefore could not treat the gain on its sale as a long-term capital gain within the meaning of § 1222 of the Internal Revenue Code. An additional ground, asserted in the Commissioner’s deficiency determination and before this Court as an alternative basis for sustaining the Tax Court’s decision, is that capital gain treatment is barred under § 1221(1) because the farm was held “primarily for sale to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McFeely v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Merrill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  5. Leeson v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pacific Coast Music Jobbers, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  2. Pacific Coast Music Jobbers, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Emsy H. Swaim and Annie Swaim, Cross v. United States of America, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. J. C. Bradford and Eleanor A. Bradford v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  5. Case v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API