Cosper v. Hancock
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pringle.
This case arises out of a dispute concerning a purported contract for the sale of uranium mining claims in McKinley County, New Mexico. The plaintiffs in error will be referred to as the Cospers, and the defendants in error will be referred to as the Hancocks.
The Cospers are the owners of the mining claims which are the subject of this dispute. In the early months of 1962, the Hancocks contacted the Cospers with regard to a possible purchase of these claims. The parties reached a tentative agreement and this ultimately resulted in the drafting of a written…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Burenheide v. WallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Bourke v. Van KeurenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Hurlburt v. DusenberySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- McGuire v. LuckenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boyer v. KarakehianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- Karakehian v. BoyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lewis v. RoperWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Matter of Estate of DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.