Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Bank v. Durant

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The complainant obtained judgment against the defendant, C. F. Durant, in the Supreme Court of this state, February 27th, 1866, for $10,664.74. To the execution issued on this judgment the sheriff returned that the defendant had no goods or lands.

Read the full summary

The complainant obtained judgment against the defendant, C. F. Durant, in the Supreme Court of this state, February 27th, 1866, for $10,664.74. To the execution issued on this judgment the sheriff returned that the defendant had no goods or lands. A large amount of real estate which C. F. Durant had owned in 1862, had, by executions on certain judgments against him, been sold to the defendant, J. J. Durant, and by him conveyed to the defendant, E. H. Durant, the wife of C. F. Durant, and are now held by her. The complainant contends that these sales were a fraudulent contrivance between the…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor,

The facts as admitted or clearly shown, are these : That in 1867, C. F. Durant owned the real estate in question, consisting of twenty-eight lots in Jersey City. They were situate in three distinct and separate parcels, one consisting of twenty-one lots, one of four lots, and one of three lots. They were worth about $100,000, were not encumbered, and he was nearly, if not wholly, free from dobt. On one *37parcel of these lots were three brick dwelling-houses, in one of which he resided, and in which he continues to reside. He also had a printing office in New York, where he…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Camden Safe Deposit Trust Co. v. GreenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  2. Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. ZuckerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API