Legal Opinion

Madaras v. Chinigo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 5, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

131 N.J. Super. 314 (1974)

329 A.2d 592

JULIA R. MADARAS, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN J. MADARAS, DECEASED, AND JULIA R. MADARAS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND PETER DE NICOLA AND ROSEMARIE DE NICOLA, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ELSIE CHINIGO, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ANDREW N. CHINIGO, CESAR GONZALEZ AND BARBARA GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND T/A CEBARB TRUCKING AND LEASING CO., AND ONTERO GONZALEZ, DEFENDANTS. ELSIE CHINIGO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ANDREW CHINIGO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF,

v.

CESAR GONZALEZ AND BARBARA GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  2. Ricciardi v. Aniero Concrete Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Orsinie v. TorranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Williams v. Remco IndustriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. Thering v. ReinkemeyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mudlin v. Hills Materials Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API