Birnbaum v. Siegler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff’s intestate, the complaint sets forth three causes of action in commingled form: (1) based on the alleged negligence of defendant, a surgeon, in the performance of an operation on February 7, 1942; (2) based on defendant’s alleged negligence in the performance of an operation on February 9, 1942; (3) based on defendant’s performance of the operation on February 9, 1942, without authority, the consent to that operation having been obtained by defendant’s alleged false representations. The complaint also contains a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Wall v. BrimCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- Karriman v. Orthopedic ClinicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Butler v. BerkeleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Darrah v. KiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Fontenelle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Paulk v. National Medical EnterprisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.