Legal Opinion

Flandermeyer v. Bonner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 2006No. 103,509PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.

This application to assume original jurisdiction and petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus was brought by the petitioner (husband) after his divorcee proceedings were rescheduled and heard piecemeal over a period of a year. We agree with the petitioner that holding a trial in a serial fashion implicates fundamental fairness, due process, and the right to a speedy and certain remedy.1 However, under the facts presented, because it appears that the delays were more attributable to the actions of the petitioner, than those of the trial court, the application to assume original…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. Pierce v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. COLE v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API