Legal Opinion

Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield v. Beauchamp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: This action was commenced by plaintiff law firm against defendants, its former clients, to recover the $46,126.73 balance of a $52,026.73 legal bill incurred in connection with plaintiffs representation of defendants in three matters primarily involving child custody. Defendants denied liability and counterclaimed for $14,000,000 in compensatory and punitive damages for plaintiff’s alleged fraud and legal malpractice in fomenting the custody litigation. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northway Eng'g v. FELIX INDUSNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Supama Coal Sales Co. v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Sabatello v. FrescatoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Lauer's Furniture Stores, Inc. v. Pittsford Place AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kerman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Shell v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API