Legal Opinion

Christler v. Locke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The defendant was the mortgagee of a mort*87gage upon the lands described in the declaration in this case. The land was owned by one Gates, who was also the mortgagor. Plaintiff was lessee under Gates. Default having been made in the mortgage, it was foreclosed by advertisement. The time of redemption expired without payment, and the sheriff’s deed became absolute. Locke thereupon instituted proceedings to recover possession under How. Stat. § 8295. Gates and Christler were both made defendants. The case was tried before the commissioner by a jury, and verdict and judgment rendered for Mr.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. VanscotenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. People ex rel. Gibson v. Clerk of the Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dawson v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API