Hudgens v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Andree Layton Roaf, Justice.
The appellant, Ralph Van Hudgens, was convicted of DWI in a bench trial in circuit court. Hudgens contends the trial judge erred by 1) not suppressing all of the state’s evidence and dismissing the charge, and 2) resentencing him to a harsher sentence upon retrial after his first conviction was reversed on appeal. We affirm the conviction, but agree that the trial judge erred in sentencing Hudgens and modify the sentence.
Ralph Van Hudgens was stopped by a Fayetteville police officer at approximately 2:00 a.m. on July 4, 1992, after the officer had observed Hudgens’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bolden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Bangs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Calnan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Winston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Whiteside v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Jerry Patterson v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026
- Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.