Legal Opinion

Coble v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bay, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

This is an action to recover damages for an alleged slander.

The petition charges that the defendant spoke of and concerning the plaintiff the following words: “ David Coble is a rogue, and he had stole Hoover’s hogs.”

The defendant, in his answer, denies having spoken the words contained in the first count of the petition, and attempts to justify as to the words in the second count.

The petition in this case contains but one co'unt, and the answer must be regarded as both a denial of the words alleged to have been spoken and a justification of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Hadley v. Delmar Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Darrett v. DonnellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  3. McCord v. Doniphan Branch Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Wertheimer-Swarts Shoe Co. v. McDonaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Bank of Monett v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API