Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cox v. Godec

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 9, 1940No. 14,682Published

1Concurrence

*78Mr. Chief Justice Francis E. Bouck

specially concurring.

In the reversal I concur. However, in view of the issues presented, showing that the plaintiff Cox was claiming to be the landlord of Godec, and under numerous previous decisions of this court, the title is not here involved within the meaning of section 25 of article VI of the Constitution of Colorado. The district court, to which the justice of the peace had certified the case in the belief that the title was necessarily involved, ought to have remanded the case to the justice for trial by him on the merits. Certification to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamill v. Bank of Clear Creek CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Potts v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Klopfer v. KellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1871
  4. Wise v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. West v. JuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API