Legal Opinion
The New Brunswick
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 30, 1903No. 1,394PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Admiralty. On motion to dismiss intervening petition.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
Morrison filed an intervening petition against the proceeds of the steamer New Brunswick, alleging that the steamer was of Portland, in the District of Maine, owned by a Maine corporation; that he had supplied her with coal and labor while she was lying at Boston; that she was in need of supplies, and that they were furnished on her credit; that he had duly filed with the city clerk of Boston the statement required by Mass. Rev. Laws, c. 198, § 15. The petition thus appeared to assert a lien of two sorts: First, a general maritime lien; and, second, a statutory lien…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Werlein v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Wildman v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Southern Minnesota Railway Extension Co. v. St. Paul & S. C. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Lincoln LandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
- Gayner v. the New OrleansDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- Liimatainen v. St. Louis River Dam & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- The New BrunswickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904