Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Pure Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1933No. 2860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of Case.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The appellants are the children and a grandchild of Georgia Rakestraw, who died intestate on January 4, 1906. The deceased was the wife of J. F. Rakestraw, who sur-' vived her and later married Hettie Clay. Appellants brought this suit against the ap-pellees to recover the community interest of Georgia Rakestraw in a tract of land in Van Zandt county. Verdict was returned in favor of the defendants in response to a peremptory charge.

The land in controversy was conveyed to J. F. Rakestraw by two deeds dated December 6, 1898, and March 11, 1899. This land,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dawson v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Baker v. ComptonTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Primm v. BartonTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Johnson v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Ransom v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rhiddlehoover v. BorenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Todd v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Craven v. CulpepperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Cuevas v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API