Legal Opinion

Coston v. McClelland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1929No. 1 Div. 554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Plaintiff counted upon a breach of defendants’ covenant of warranty in the sale of a tract of land. The original complaint alleged that defendants “conveyed by their warranty deed to the plaintiff a three-fourths interest” in the lands described. Defendants’ deed to plaintiff having been excluded by the court, plaintiff amended his complaint by striking the words “a three-fourths interest,” and then again offered the deed in evidence. On defendants’ objection that the deed was “irrelevant, immaterial and a variance from the complaint,” the court again ruled against its admissibility, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dickson v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Reynolds v. ShaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Hiner v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McClelland v. CostonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Henderson v. NolandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API