McArthur v. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
We granted Defendant-Appellant East Tennessee Natural Gas Company’s (hereinafter “the Utility”), application for permission to appeal in these consolidated cases because they have raised an issue of public interest that needs to be addressed and resolved. This case involves a dispute over the location of the boundaries of an easement. The broader, public policy issue concerns what duty, if any, a utility has to a landowner to give notice of the location of the boundaries of an easement, once the utility has selected its boundary.
The Utility is an interstate pipeline…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tennessee Public Service Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Greig Massey v. R.W. Graf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- Borough of Naugatuck v. G.D.C. Naugatuck, Inc., No. 081729 (Jan. 6, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Cynthia Barnett v. Barbara BehringerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Greig Massey v. R.W. Graf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.