Legal Opinion

People v. Cox

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 2008No. C057500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, J.

This case recasts Justice Cardozo’s oft-quoted dictum on the exclusionary rule: 1 although the constables here blundered, the defendant will not go free.

After the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, defendant Donnell Cox pled no contest to a charge of resisting an executive officer arising from his refusal to permit officers to search him and his subsequent attempt to evade arrest. The trial court sentenced defendant to 16 months in prison, but granted him credit for time served and released him on parole.

On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in denying…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando Lopez-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AlbarengaNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Carcamo v. L.A. County Sheriff's Dept.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. P. v. Kimmons CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. Jones CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. SouthardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API