Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hollingsworth v. Georgia Fruit Growers Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 30, 1938No. 11869Published

1ConcurrenceBell, Justice

In view of the difficulty which the court has had in reaching a final decision in this case, and which is so well known to counsel, the writer feels that it is not improper to amplify his own views, which are concurred in by Chief Justice Russell and by Justices Jenkins and Grice, by adding the following to the ruling as given by the majority through the Chief Justice. That ruling, which is adhered to, was the original decision in the case, while the present opinion has been prepared on rehearing. First, a brief statement of the facts, and then some reference to the legal questions involved.

Ge…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwindleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Exchange Bank v. Macon Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Waycross Air-Line Railroad v. Offerman & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Lenney v. FinleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API