Legal Opinion

Turzinski v. Pam

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1946No. 28989. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Cook county. Jurisdiction on direct appeal is asserted because it is alleged that a constitutional question is involved. The alleged constitutional question is based on instruction No. 1, tendered by the plaintiff and given to the jury by the court. The instruction is as follows:

“1. You are instructed that at the time and place of the collision in question there was in full force and effect a certain statute of the State of Illinois which provided as follows: ‘(a) Every pedestrian, crossing a roadway at any point other than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moran v. GatzIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Jenisek v. RiggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Chicago & Great Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Shilvock v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API