Legal Opinion

Dobbs v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 4, 1987No. 85-1206PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment based on a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, Dr. M.D. Smith. The plaintiff, John N. Dobbs, filed suit against Smith for malpractice in inserting an intraocular lens after a cataract operation. After hearing testimony from the witnesses, including Dobbs and Smith, the trial court granted Smith's motion because Dobbs had failed to make out a prima facie case. We affirm.

The facts of this case are as follows:

Smith is a specialist in ophthalmology. In 1975, he undertook training in the intraocular lens field in Yonworst, Holland. He treated glaucoma and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Turner v. Peoples Bank of Pell CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Holt v. GodsilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Tuscaloosa Orthopedic Appliance Co. v. WyattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Rosemont, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bradford v. McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Pruitt v. ZeigerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. University of Alabama Health Services Foundation, P.C. v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Keebler v. Winfield Carraway Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Levesque v. Regional Medical Center Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API