Legal Opinion

Fetrow v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 30, 2004No. 00425PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

This case requires us to analyze the crime of robbery, with particular emphasis on the “intent to frighten” variety. A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted David Michael Fetrow, appellant, of the robbery of Theodore Machen, along with related charges, including theft, hit and run, fleeing and eluding, and reckless driving.1 On appeal, Fetrow poses one question: “Is the evidence insufficient to sustain the conviction for robbery?” We answer “no” and shall therefore affirm.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

As a result of his conduct on November 19, 2001,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API