Legal Opinion

Hobby v. Feldman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 13, 1984No. 2268PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, by their complaint, sought a judgment declaring invalid the mortgage held by the defendants on the real property of the plaintiffs. The defendants, by their counterclaim, sought damages from the plaintiffs for failure to pay amounts due under an agreement. The agreement created the obligation for which the mortgage held by the defendants was security. The trial court issued a factually detailed memorandum of decision and rendered judgment for the defendants on the complaint and on the counterclaim. We have carefully considered the claims of error of the *697plaintiffs on appeal1…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leabo v. LeninskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  2. Halepas v. MalerbaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. MacArthur/Nathan Associates v. Edson Realty, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Shetucket Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Solar Processes, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API