Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cheeks v. Wirt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1931No. 25,776PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTreanor, J.

The appellant, as. next friend of the relatrix, began suit in the Lake Superior Court for the purpose of mandating appellees either to re instate relatrix in a certain named high school or to transfer and admit her “as a high-school pupil in one of the accredited high schools of the . . . school city of Gary, Indiana.” The initial pleading of appellant inaccurately “prays that a writ of mandamus issue” from the trial court requiring the defendants “to show cause”; but no objection was made to the form of the pleading and it will be treated on appeal as if it had been properly drawn as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. Washington Territory Ex Rel. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Cory v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State ex rel. City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Mitchell v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State ex rel. Oliver v. GrubbIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kostas v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. State Ex Rel. HarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Durkee v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  4. BOARD OF MEDICAL REGISTRATION, ETC. v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Board of Medical Registration & Examination v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API