Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas Byron Clark

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1972No. 71-1561PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

In this case, we are asked to permit a defendant who entered a plea of nolo contendere in the District Court to assert, on appeal, that his motion to suppress evidence should have been granted. In order to do so, we would have to reject the rule that a plea of nolo contendere, like a plea of guilty, waives all non-jurisdictional defects, including allegedly illegal searches and seizures. See, United States ex rel. Rogers v. Warden of Attica State Prison, 381 F.2d 209 (2nd Cir. 1967); Hughes v. United States, 371 F.2d 694 (8th Cir. 1967); Bell v. C. I. R., 320 F.2d 953…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. James Rogers v. Warden of Attica State Prison, Attica, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Thomas Hughes, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Jose Julio Gonzalez-ParraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. M.H. Bell and Bettie Lou Bell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. TurcotteMontana Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API