Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel is without merit. "[T]he evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [the] * * * case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that [his] attorney provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147; see, People v Russo, 85 NY2d 872, 874; People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021; People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184,187-188). Although County Court should have sustained defense counsel’s objection to the prosecutor’s statement on summation that the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. HobotNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ChavezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. BrandonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API