People v. Taylor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel is without merit. "[T]he evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [the] * * * case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that [his] attorney provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147; see, People v Russo, 85 NY2d 872, 874; People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021; People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184,187-188). Although County Court should have sustained defense counsel’s objection to the prosecutor’s statement on summation that the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. HobotNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. ChavezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. BrandonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008