Legal Opinion
In Re Interest of Leo L.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2000No. S-99-386PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
The separate juvenile court of Douglas County found Leo L. II to be a child within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-247(1) (Reissue 1998). Leo contends that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to sustain this adjudication because the State failed to establish venue for the underlying offense. We conclude that in a juvenile case, the State need not prove that the juvenile’s underlying act occurred within the county in which the petition was filed. We therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
Leo was arrested on October 14, 1998, and was charged with obstructing a peace officer, a Class I…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Interest of Brandy M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. VejvodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Interest of Jeremy U.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- A.W. Ex Rel. Doe v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- State v. Brandon M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Jordan B. (In Re Interest of Jordan B.)Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Interest of Jordan B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.