Grays Harbor Boom Co. v. Lytle Logging & Mercantile Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered March 22, 1901, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover for services in booming logs.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The plaintiff brought this action ag’ainst the defendant to recover boomage charges alleged to be due for services, rendered by the plaintiff in booming and rafting logs belonging to the defendant. The complaint contained eight causes of action, all of which were very similar in their nature. In the first and fourth causes of action, the plaintiff claimed boomage charges on logs placed in the river above tide water, and also upon logs placed in tide water. The remaining causes of action were to recover boomage charges upon logs placed in the river above tide water. At the trial the jury…
2Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BrundageCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Brown v. GillettWashington Supreme Court · 1905