Legal Opinion
Amanda Hoyt v. Arizona Board of Regents
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 21, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01807Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Amanda Hoyt, No. CV-25-01807-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Arizona Board of Regents, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Amanda Hoyt (“Plaintiff”) alleges that her former employer, the Arizona Board of 16 Regents (“Defendant”), violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) in two 17 distinct respects. Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss one of 18 Plaintiff’s ADA claims based on a lack of administrative exhaustion. (Doc. 11.) For the 19 reasons that follow, the motion is denied. 20…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Marder v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.