Legal Opinion

Almand v. Reese

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1952No. 17858PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

The defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions in this court, stating therein numerous grounds for dismissal. We think it sufficient to say that we have carefully considered each and every ground of this motion and find no merit in any of them.

In the instant case, there are four types of alleged claimants to the proceeds of the policy of fire insurance, and a fifth, who in an intervention claims the fund. First, there is the holder of a security deed to the property insured and destroyed by fire, who was protected by an endorsement on the policy.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Thurber Whyland Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Campbell v. Trust Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Little & Green v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Mandeville v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Mayor &C. of CarrolltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Farris v. United StatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. National Automobile Insurance v. VaughnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. BRIDGES Et Al. v. COLLINS-HOOTEN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. BRIDGES Et Al. v. COLLINS-HOOTEN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API