Legal Opinion

Estate of Temple v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 22, 1976No. Docket Nos. 727-72, 728-72PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Held, the transcript of the testimony given by the taxpayer's accountant before a Federal grand jury is not qualified as an exception to the hearsay rule under rule 803(24) or 804(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and accordingly may not be received as substantive evidence in a subsequent civil action involving the tax liability of the taxpayer, where both the accountant and the taxpayer were deceased and therefore unavailable to testify at the trial, there was no…

Read the full summary

Held, the transcript of the testimony given by the taxpayer's accountant before a Federal grand jury is not qualified as an exception to the hearsay rule under rule 803(24) or 804(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and accordingly may not be received as substantive evidence in a subsequent civil action involving the tax liability of the taxpayer, where both the accountant and the taxpayer were deceased and therefore unavailable to testify at the trial, there was no cross-examination or opportunity for cross-examination of the accountant by the taxpayer or his representative, and, in view…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Bruce, Judge:

This case is presently before the Court upon a motion by respondent to admit into evidence a transcript of the testimony of W. W. Kerr, accountant for the taxpayer Hollis R. Temple, during the taxable years involved, given before a Federal grand jury in Biloxi, Miss., on January 21, 1971. The question presented is whether a transcript of the testimony given before a Federal grand jury may be received as substantive evidence in a subsequent civil action involving the tax liability of the taxpayer. Both the accountant and the taxpayer were deceased and therefore unavailable…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of Temple v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Kluger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  3. Graham v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  4. Goldsmith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. Catalanotto v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API