Legal Opinion
Anoka Orthopaedic Associates, P.A. v. Mutschler
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 20, 1989No. Civ. 4-86-539PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ and defendants’ motions for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ motion requests the Court to hold that defendant Edward J. Lechner is a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Pub.L. No. 93-406, 88 Stat. 829 (codified at 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (1982) and portions of the Internal Revenue Code). Defendants’ motion requests the Court to dismiss all of plaintiffs’ ERISA claims on two grounds: (1) that defendants are not fiduciaries and (2) that certain funds that are the subject matter of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Al Nieto, Clarence Valdez, Adrian Munenmann, Lester Olivera and Joana L. Gonzales v. Louis Ecker, and Roger FrommerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Yeseta v. BaimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Brandt v. GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Useden v. AckerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Vogel v. Independence Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- Useden v. AckerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Anoka Orthopaedic Associates, P.A. v. MutschlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Anoka Orthopaedic Associates, P.A. v. LechnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.