Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robinson v. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 331 Minidoka

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1983No. 14753Published

1Concurrence

BAKES, Justice,

specially concurring:

I concur with the majority opinion that substantial and competent evidence was presented to support the magistrate’s findings. The district court erred in reversing the magistrate court for failing to find that the board adopted a policy requiring an annual determination for special service salaries on an individual basis. The magis*493trate considered the evidence that the board adopted such a policy prior to the master agreement, but concluded in the memorandum opinion “that the policy of the board from 1973 until 1977 when the master agreement was signed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knutsen v. FrushourIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Joseph v. Village of Downers GroveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. McFetridge v. WieckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API