Legal Opinion

Raipe v. Gorrell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Judge. On January 10, 1896, the defendants, having a- general agency for the Iowa Life Insurance Company, entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff whereby he agreed for one year to devote all his time, energy, and ability in' working life insurance for said company as state agent, under defendants’ direction, with headquarters at Milwaukee, paying his own expenses, he to be allowed to…

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Judge. On January 10, 1896, the defendants, having a- general agency for the Iowa Life Insurance Company, entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff whereby he agreed for one year to devote all his time, energy, and ability in' working life insurance for said company as state agent, under defendants’ direction, with headquarters at Milwaukee, paying his own expenses, he to be allowed to pay not exceeding twenty per cent, commission to parties assisting him in procuring business, or for discount of notes,…

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

1. Sufficiency of the general exception to the court’s order of confirmation, in order to enable review of the specific exceptions taken to the referee’s findings, is challenged. While such review cannot be had in absence of any exception to the order of confirmation (Momsen v. Atkins, ante, p. 557), we have recently held, at least impliedly, that a general exception will suffice (Hinz v. Van Dusen, 95 Wis. 503, 506; Small v. Prentice, 102 Wis. 257); although, as was said in Lemke v. Daegling, 52 Wis. 498, this court will exercise its discretion to refuse such review where exceptions to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Van DusenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Prentiss v. LedyardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Custin v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Dickinson v. Norwegian Plow Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Wilkinson v. WilkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Monroe Water Works Co. v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Burgess v. Commercial National Bank of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wenger v. MartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Clark v. Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API