Legal Opinion · Dissent

Akins v. Happy Hour, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1981No. 43765Published

1DissentHastings, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. There is no authority of which I am aware which permits the translation of a scheduled disability into a disability of the body as a whole where as here the effect of the injury is the usual and natural one expected. Broderson v. Federal Chemical Co., 199 Neb. 278, 258 N.W.2d 137 (1977); Guerin v. Insurance Co. of North America, 183 Neb. 30, 157 N.W.2d 779 (1968). Had the two injuries arisen out of the same accident, the plaintiff would have been limited in his recovery to the two scheduled disabilities. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-121(3) (Reissue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Broderson v. Federal Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Guerin v. Insurance Company of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API