Cablevision Systems Development Co. v. Board of Assessors
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Inasmuch as plaintiff in this case conceded that the property sought to be taxed was properly taxable and did not allege that the tax assessors lacked jurisdiction over the property but, rather, sought only a partial exemption, we agree with the Appellate Division that a declaratory judgment action could not properly be brought upon the facts alleged. (See Sikora Realty Corp. v City of New York, 262 NY 312, 317-318; Young Women’s Christian Assn. v City of New York, 217 App Div 406, 410, affd 245…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- MATTER OF MANHATTAN CABLE TV SERVS., DIV. OF STERLING INFO. SERVS., INC. v. FreybergNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cablevision Sys. Dev. Co. v. BD. OF ASSESSORS OF THE COUNTY OF NASSAUNew York Court of Appeals · 1980