Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Diehl v. Abele

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1928No. 20928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The principal question raised by the record involves the problem of the right to referendum upon Ordinance No. 893, the second bond issue ordinance, under Sections 4, 5, 8, and 12, Article XVIII, of the Ohio Constitution. These sections, in their material portions, read as follows:

Section 4: “Any municipality may acquire, construct, own, lease and operate within or without its corporate limits, any public utility the product or service of which is or is to be supplied to the municipality or its inhabitants, and may contract with others for any such product or service. * * * ”

Section 5: “Any…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chandler v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Didelius v. City CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. James Ex Rel. City of Columbus v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. STATE Ex SHELL, v. ABBOTT EtOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. STATE Ex SWEENEY v. MICHELL EtOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API