Cook v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Judge.
We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to consider whether the prosecutor commented on the appellant’s failure to testify during his argument at the guilt-innocence phase of the trial. The record shows that the prosecutor made the following argument:
“MR. McSPADDEN: During voir dire I told you at that time that I would find out what the defense is the same time you find out, and A., I told you first of all there are several defenses we usually heard. A., would be mistaken identity. They couldn’t do that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Cruz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Darby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.