Legal Opinion

Gainey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1980No. 79-1462Published

1Opinion of the Court

BERANEK, Judge.

Appellant pled nolo contendere and reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress certain physical _ evidence. We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for a determination of whether the ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress the tangible evidence was dispositive of the case. Gainey v. State, 386 So.2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The trial court entered an order on October 14, 1980, finding that the motion to suppress did not present a dispos-itive issue. The defendant’s nolo conten-dere plea was entered prior to the date of Brown v. State, 376 So.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Gainey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API