Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramiro Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1977No. 76-3823PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

This case involves the question of whether the grand jury testimony of a previously convicted coconspirator who refuses to testify at trial is admissible against a criminal defendant. We hold that the transcript is inadmissible hearsay because it does not qualify either as a statement against interest, Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(3), or as a statement with “equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness,” Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(5).

The facts reflect a typical marijuana importation plan along the Texas border. Rogelio Guerrero was hired to drive a truck to a certain spot, wait…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. William John BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. John MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. People v. RameyIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. DayeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API