Vicks v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
We will enlarge upon the 1st headnote only. A motion to set aside the verdict was made on the ground, among others, that the indictment was void on its face and no verdict could be sustained thereon, because it failed to set forth any violation of the laws of Georgia. It was also alleged tjhat the verdict should be set aside because the indictment seeks to ^et forth in two counts thereof two separate and distinct offenses, it not being alleged that these offenses constituted one transaction. The indictment in this case is the same one under which B. H. Gaulden, who was jointly indicted with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cawthon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Robson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Gaulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byrd v. RickettsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- State v. AikersUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Fictum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.