Legal Opinion

Arroyo v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 8, 2009No. 1-08-2441, 1-08-2482 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE CUNNINGHAM

delivered the opinion of the court:

Following an internal investigation into allegations of employee misconduct, the defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), terminated the plaintiffs, Michael Arroyo and Carl Horhach. Subsequently, a joint hearing was held for both plaintiffs under section 28 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (Act) (70 ILCS 3605/28 (West 2006)), after which the CTA Transit Board (the Board) upheld the plaintiffs’ terminations. Under a petition for common law writ of certiorari, the circuit court of Cook County affirmed the Board’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Russell v. Department of Natural ResourcesIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kreiser v. Police BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Basketfield v. Police Board of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kreiser v. Police BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blackout Sealcoating, Incorpor v. Terry PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Grady v. Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API