Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Mayor of Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1895Published

On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 28 Vroom 298.

1DissentGarrison, J.

The act entitled “An act providing for the formation and establishment of wards in cities of the first class” (Pamph. L. 1894, p. 387), seems to me to be unconstitutional upon both of the grounds urged against it.

First, because it is special. The act applies, to cities of the first class only, and in such cities its effect is to place a legislative question affecting election precincts in the hands of the executive, through his appointees, to be administered once for all without any of those provisions for readjustment to increase of voting population that obtain in the case of less populous…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Inc. of the Ridgefield ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  2. Allen v. Commissioners of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  3. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API