Legal Opinion

Holstein v. Norandex, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1995No. 22518PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Judge: 1

The appellant, Melvin Holstein, was sixty-three years of age when he was discharged from his employment as an inside salesperson with the appellee, Norandex, Inc., in Nitro, West Virginia. On 29 April 1991, appellee Michael Counts, the manager of No-randex’s Nitro office, informed Holstein: “Mel ... I have some bad news for you ... Norandex has eliminated your job. They don’t need you any longer.” Norandex characterizes Holstein’s firing as a “cost cutting measure,” but Holstein argues the reason given for his discharge is merely a pretext for unlawful age discrimination.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mildred MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Robert L. Mason, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. SnyderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. Simpkins v. HarveyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Shell v. BechtoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Vivian v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Conrad v. Ara SzaboWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Williamson v. GreeneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Haynes v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Michael Ex Rel. Michael v. Appalachian Heating, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API