Legal Opinion

People v. Rembo

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1977No. Docket 25297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.

In a jury trial, defendant was convicted of possession of secobarbital in violation of the Controlled Substances Act. MCLA 335.341(4)(b); MSA 18.1070(41)(4)(b). After being placed on two years probation with the first four months in jail plus costs, defendant appeals as a matter of right.

Defendant claims that it was error to admit a vial containing the secobarbital into evidence over his objection, where it was taken from his car without a warrant after his arrest for drunk driving.

The facts are not in dispute. On January 9, 1975, an Allen Park police officer observed the defendant pick up a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. People v. WhalenMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. TisiMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RidgewayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. LynnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. ChernowasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. RemboMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API